Saturday, April 11, 2009

Reviews
Each movie has been reviewed by its audience. After the show, some will be happy while others will mock it. So this is what happened in Al Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth” which talks about the Global Warming. This essay will look at some of the arguments for and against the movie.

Some of the reviewers didn’t enjoy the movie for some reasons which made the movie bad to their point of view. Firstly, the movie was a commercial advertisement for Al Gore, because he was narrating his personal stories (Nash). Secondly, the way that Al Gore jokes against Republicans was not fair, where he considered the movie is political more than sending a real message (Nash). Finally the issue of Global Warming is political more than being scientific (Nash).

On the other hand, there were many people totally agreed with him. One of the people from Sierra Club staff enjoyed the movie. He believes that although Al Gore is not a scientist, still he convinced him that the case is serious and people should help (Barry). He really liked the editing of the movie where he finds that it attracts the audience with the images of the glaciers, especially the scene which showed the spread and effect of the CO2 in damaging the world (Barry). In Conclusion, I really enjoyed watching this movie for I believe what positive reviewer believes in. After the show, I started to concentrate on the world and try to study the facts. For example, I can see that the winter is getting too short in the world. All the images and disasters I saw in this film really touched me. Fortunately, I received his message.


Bibliography


Barry, John. "An Inconvenient Truth reviews." Sierra Club. 1 Apr. 2009 http://www.sierraclub.org/energy/ait/reviews/.
Nash, Scott. "An Inconvenient Truth movie review." Rotten Tomatoes. 25 Nov. 2006. 2 Apr. 2006 http://www.threemoviebuffs.com/review.php?movieID=inconvenienttruth.

No comments:

Post a Comment